This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| ac_instructions [2011/04/02 23:15] – nickroy | ac_instructions [2011/04/19 00:19] (current) – nickroy | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| * The reviewers will need to be notified that they have received their assignments and need to be let loose. CMT does not do this automatically. The best way is to mail them directly. (CMT provides a way for you to email your reviewers and fill in their papers, etc. But honestly, here be dragons.) | * The reviewers will need to be notified that they have received their assignments and need to be let loose. CMT does not do this automatically. The best way is to mail them directly. (CMT provides a way for you to email your reviewers and fill in their papers, etc. But honestly, here be dragons.) | ||
| + | === Shepherding Conditional Accepts === | ||
| + | * Please go ahead and contact your authors. | ||
| + | * The final call on the paper will primarily be yours, so be sure you know what you want. Be explicit with the authors as to what needs to happen. If you aren't sure yet, please take a few minutes to figure it out. I think everyone is clear, but if the details have become fuzzy in your mind since the AC meeting, give me a call and we can sort it out. | ||
| + | * Please set a timetable with your authors. It would be a mistake to get the next revision of the paper on May 25th. You probably will need to negotiate the exact timetable with your authors, but I would recommend getting a new version of the paper in early- to mid-May at the latest. | ||
| + | * Expect to iterate. | ||
| + | * If you think you need to, please feel free to get on the phone with the authors and talk them through the proposed changes. | ||
| + | * Make sure the authors know to include a summary of the changes at the front of their final revision. If you aren't happy with these changes, you should let me know. | ||